TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 81HE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81HE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '20 at 22:21
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 126
2-Core 226
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 673
72% 574 Pts
64-Core 783
48% 783 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 90.8%
 Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060
Legend(17AA 3FFE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.78
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.9% Good
Lighting 82.7
Reflection 95.9
Parallax 90.4
67% 89.7 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 74.3
Splatting 73.8
72% 90.4 fps
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 68.9%
 Great: 77%
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Gigabyte(1458 3FE9)
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4193 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.78
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 139
Parallax 159
114% 146 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 132
Splatting 95.3
99% 124 fps
Poor: 116% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1101 512GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10130001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1100 837 851 847 848 735 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 971
Write 1,624
Mixed 1,176
SusWrite 870
263% 1,160 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 49.1
162% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 718
DQ Write 1,035
DQ Mixed 832
642% 862 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑
This bench: 181%
 Great: 256%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
155GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 321 327 322 323 319 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 366
Write 355
Mixed 343
SusWrite 320
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 26.1
86% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 110
81% 106 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 65.7%
 Great: 97%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
941GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 81 81 82 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 89.2
Write 79.7
Mixed 51.4
SusWrite 81
100% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
162% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑
This bench: 44.3%
 Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 30.4
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 27.3
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 93.1%
 Great: 90%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 81HE Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 81HE

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples276x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples17x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples1x
GPU
GeForce RTX 2060NvidiaBench 68%, 3,498 samples125x
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 77%, 6,944 samples116x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples53x
SSD
PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1101 512GBWDCBench 195%, 3,929 samples55x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 180%, 5,016 samples38x
WDC PC SN720 SDA 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 3,501 samples16x
RAM
RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 2x8GBRamaxelBench 76%, 8,736 samples162x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples31x
RMSA3300ME78HBF-2666 2x16GBRamaxelBench 81%, 1,100 samples10x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback