Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	20.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '20 at 17:26
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3355 6 User benchmarks, average bench 13% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Memory 15.3 1-Core 40.8 2-Core 71.3 22% 42.5 Pts	4-Core 77.5 8-Core 79.1 10% 78.3 Pts	64-Core 80.2 5% 80.2 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 17%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 69GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 86 68 93 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.2% Poor	Read 250 Write 122 Mixed 216 SusWrite 79.6 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 7.9 4K Mixed 7.3 16% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x4GB 2,234 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM RAM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 4.5 16% 5.77 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 2.6 9% 3.2 GB/s	Latency 357 11% 357 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 118%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16