Asrock 970 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120327
Uptime20.1 Days
Run DateApr 02 '20 at 17:06
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 130
56% 91.9 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 332
33% 268 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Lighting 74.4
Reflection 74.5
Parallax 63.3
61% 70.7 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 73.2
59% 71.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
726GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 221 271 286 283 275 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 445
Write 383
Mixed 366
SusWrite 258
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 45
146% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 235
176% 235 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 133%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
729GB free
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 219 204 188 184 188 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
69% Good
Read 451
Write 358
Mixed 193
SusWrite 199
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 27.1
91% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 136
130% 203 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
545GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 89 86 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 120
Write 114
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 87.6
70% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.2% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 12.8
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 - $82

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $370
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback