Asrock Z97M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z97M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '17 at 12:05
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3258-$38
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 229
31% 232 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0402) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 3.25
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.12 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ACSC2M128mSA 127GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0831A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 309
Write 132
Mixed 191
46% 211 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 2.22
77% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 19.8
47% 95.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 96.1
Write 106
Mixed 92.9
74% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.21
84% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58%
Great: 61%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40
298GB free
Firmware: ES2OA70F Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 74.7
Write 76.8
Mixed 74.5
57% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.76
4K Mixed 0.26
62% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5673GB0-CH9 Kingston 99U5458-008.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.2% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z97M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback