Asus P7H55-USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-USB3 (all builds)
Memory	2.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101214
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '14 at 19:11
Run Duration	800 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 79.4 2-Core 148 52% 113 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 269 36% 269 Pts	64-Core 284 18% 284 Pts
Poor: 50% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 106GB free Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 121 117 6950 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 940 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16476 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 936 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 23 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 109 109 275806 (C2) HDA temperature 112 103 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	50.2% Above average	Read 89.6 Write 85.4 Mixed 26.5 49% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.24 72% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 68%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 98GB free Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 128 125 6600 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7516 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16567 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 938 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 18 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 182 182 54057 (C2) HDA temperature 109 99 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 198 198 436 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 198 198 436 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 26 (C8) Write error rate 198 198 436	33.1% Below average	Read 64.1 Write 51.2 Mixed 36.4 38% 50.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 0.45 4K Mixed 0.05 32% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 12GB free Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 199338645 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9268 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 8415261 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 9284 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 999 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 55 622198820 (C2) HDA temperature 36 45 68719476772 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 34 20 199338645 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -38933878524276 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1575946897 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1775596547	45.1% Average	Read 78.5 Write 78.9 Mixed 44 50% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 0.37 4K Mixed 0.14 51% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 10GB free Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 70 70 9710 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3368 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 11590 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 493 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 58 437256218 (C2) HDA temperature 68 57 537919520 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 95137 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	31.5% Below average	Read 73 Write 36.3 Mixed 31.7 35% 47 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.3 87% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 62%
WD 20EADS External 2TB 284 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 368GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 29.3 Write 23.6 Mixed 16.2 28% 23 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.15 57% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 20%
WD 7500AAV External 750GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 48GB free, PID 1001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 28 Write 24 Mixed 8.91 24% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.28 73% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 22%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 32GB-$15 665 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 17GB free, PID 1642 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	4.92% Terrible	Read 19.9 Write 3.96 Mixed 6.9 10% 10.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.91 4K Write 0.004 4K Mixed 0.003 18% 1.64 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.92% Great: 10%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB 310 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 4GB free, PID 1d00 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	3.23% Terrible	Read 12.2 Write 3.13 Mixed 1.34 5% 5.54 MB/s	4K Read 3.09 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.01 12% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.23% Great: 5%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-USB3 Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-USB3

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	33x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	32x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	10x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	7x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	4x
BX100 250GBCrucial $141Bench 87%, 42,930 samples	3x

RAM
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	32x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	31x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus P7H55-USB3

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-USB3

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)