Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemToshiba Qosmio X75-A  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory4.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140418
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateApr 01 '20 at 22:43
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 80
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 174
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 447
47% 376 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA77) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 3.53
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 5.5
3% 8.9 fps
MRender 6.76
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 7.04
4% 5.31 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541515A9E630 1.5TB
446GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KA0OA500
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 55 56 56 58 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 97.5
Write 97.5
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 57.2
50% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.9% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 11.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Qosmio X75-A Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $376
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback