Lenovo SharkBay

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo SharkBay  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '20 at 21:56
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4010U-$280
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 44.5
2-Core 83.6
47% 69.9 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 111
16% 116 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3978) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.58% Terrible
Lighting 2.77
Reflection 3.92
Parallax 4.47
2% 3.72 fps
MRender 3.76
Gravity 1.87
Splatting 5.48
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.58%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM000-SSHD-8GB 500GB
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LVD3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 82 88 81 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 84
Write 87.8
Mixed 29
SusWrite 80.3
51% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.5
281% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 63%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
10GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5 5.4 5.5 5.7 5.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
7.81% Terrible
Read 25
Write 6.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 5.2
12% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 2
104% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.81%
Great: 17%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB
29GB free, PID null, Sandisk Ultra Dual Drive
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 19 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 16.2
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 20.2
26% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2
125% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564128FJ8NWRNSQG 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 6.4
25% 8.67 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SharkBay Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo SharkBay

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $431
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback