Acer Aspire TC-280

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire TC-280 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire TC-280
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160426
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 01 '20 at 21:48
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka) 15,719 User benchmarks, average bench 41% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Memory 56.7 1-Core 68.4 2-Core 93 45% 72.7 Pts	4-Core 191 8-Core 190 26% 190 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Lighting 39.2 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 36.8 32% 35.4 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 37.9 Splatting 35.8 30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-CC128 128GB 401 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: GC71201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 172 163 130 130 129 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Read 350 Write 176 Mixed 214 SusWrite 148 49% 222 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 64.8 4K Mixed 28.4 102% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 258 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 130 120% 188 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 553GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 176 179 181 182 181 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 180 Mixed 86 SusWrite 178 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 112%
ADATA CH11 1TB 809 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 379GB free, PID a11a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 30 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 27.4 Write 24 Mixed 16.1 SusWrite 29.4 32% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 16GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.5% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 6.5 20% 6.83 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 6.8 18% 6.17 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire TC-280 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-280

CPU
A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 41%, 15,719 samples	44x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	19x
Radeon R7 430AMDBench 7%, 178 samples	3x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
Series SATA SSD 120GBVBench 63%, 3,411 samples	1x
CV1-CC128 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 401 samples	1x

RAM
ACR16D3LU1KBGR/4G ACR16D3LU1KBGR/8G 12GBKingstonBench 22%, 301 samples	9x
ACR16D3LU1KBGR/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 29%, 150 samples	5x
16KTF1G64AZ-1G6P1 1x8GBMicronBench 30%, 1,490 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16