Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics78.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '19 at 07:19
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 68.6
2-Core 131
60% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 399
39% 320 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Gigabyte(1458 3FC5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Lighting 99.1
Reflection 92.2
Parallax 91.5
81% 94.3 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 91.1
Splatting 81.1
74% 92.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$55
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 376 401 401 391 361 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 392
Mixed 399
SusWrite 379
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 45.3
141% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 228
176% 240 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
476GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 175 170 169 172 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 168
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 172
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 112%
WD Elements 25A3 2TB
1TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 127 127 126 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 112
Write 114
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 126
149% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 59%
ADATA CH11 1TB
128GB free, PID a11a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 19 0 9.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.46% Terrible
Read 29.5
Write 26.8
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 19
29% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.46%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.3% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 14.5
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 11.2
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback