Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD5  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '17 at 14:36
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 96.8
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 169
71% 117 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 425
46% 363 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1627 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Lighting 74.6
Reflection 67.2
Parallax 66.2
61% 69.3 fps
MRender 72.2
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 61
54% 67.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
380GB free
Firmware: EMT0
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 386
Write 192
Mixed 241
60% 273 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 33.3
115% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 0.81
37% 87.7 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
465GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 119
Write 115
Mixed 84.9
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.49
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 70%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
384GB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 114
Write 111
Mixed 15.9
58% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 5.05
4K Mixed 0.48
183% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
213GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 85.4
Write 82.2
Mixed 24.6
47% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.37
4K Mixed 0.26
89% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 17.6
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 50.9
79% 50.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD5 Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $259
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback