Fujitsu ESPRIMO P710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P710  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3161-A1
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '20 at 10:44
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 187
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 375
50% 375 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
ASRock(1849 5001) 2GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.3.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 21.7
15% 23.5 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 16
Splatting 31.7
21% 25 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 109 109 108 106 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 451
Write 115
Mixed 177
SusWrite 108
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 26.6
100% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 167
148% 229 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 185 186 185 186 187 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 115
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 185
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 M378B1G73EB0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.8% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.2
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO P710 Builds (Compare 645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback