Acer Aspire V7-581

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire V7-581  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Dazzle_CX
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '20 at 02:17
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3227U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
47% Average
Memory 76.3
1-Core 45.5
2-Core 76.1
44% 66 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 106
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0798) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.96% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 2.78
4% 4.19 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 0.09
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.96%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SMS151S324G 24GB
0GB free
Firmware: S9FM00.7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 317
Write 35
Mixed 136
35% 163 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 14.2
63% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 86.8
DQ Mixed 7.4
32% 73.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 55%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
303GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 6.1 11 13 10 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.03% Terrible
Read 1.7
Write 11.5
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 8.9
4% 5.95 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 3.03%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida FCJ41UG6BBU0-DJ-F Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.3% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 13.8
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 11.1
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V7-581 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V7-581

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback