Acer TravelMate 4050

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory0.75GB is enough RAM for Windows XP.
OS VersionWindows XP is considerably out of date. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10. (Note: an additional 0.25GB of RAM is recommended prior to upgrading.)
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer TravelMate 4050  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer TravelMate 4050
Memory0.4 GB free of 0.75 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows XP
BIOS Date20050103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '15 at 09:37
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium M processor 1.50GHz
mPGA478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 16.3
2-Core 17.6
9% 17 Pts
4-Core 18.1
8-Core 18.1
2% 18.1 Pts
64-Core 18.3
1% 18.3 Pts
Poor: 23% Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST94019A 40GB
26GB free (System drive)
Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 27.4
Mixed 15.6
17% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.11
4K Write 0.08
4K Mixed 0.09
16% 0.09 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 17%
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback