Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88X Extreme4+  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160513
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 30 '20 at 21:47
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 43.8
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 125
44% 79.3 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 178
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
ASRock(1849 130F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.72% Terrible
Lighting 7.07
Reflection 7.46
Parallax 11.7
6% 8.73 fps
MRender 4.57
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 7.48
6% 6.75 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.72%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
470GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 346 290 195 98 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.8% Average
Read 142
Write 89.7
Mixed 104
SusWrite 242
33% 144 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 21.3
66% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 62
DQ Write 93.4
DQ Mixed 116
77% 90.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$150
151GB free
Firmware: 12.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 52 54 53 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 76.5
Write 76
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 53.7
48% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 51%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
705GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 99 100 102 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 103
Write 101
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 100
113% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 49%
Verbatim STORE N GO 64GB
28GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.7 3.6 8.5 4.9 4.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Read 10.3
Write 3.3
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 4.7
6% 5.25 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
23% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 10%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
7GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 44 40 42 27 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 114
Write 28.3
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 36.7
56% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1.3
80% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix DMT451E6BFR8C-PB DMT451E6BFR8C-PB Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
19% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 7.9
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.2
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 19%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88X Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+ - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback