Asrock H370 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H370 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190507
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 30 '20 at 15:32
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User BRB-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 95
1-Core 142
2-Core 282
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 908
89% 729 Pts
64-Core 1134
70% 1134 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 152
Parallax 138
123% 147 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 146
Splatting 117
104% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 113%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 475 280 254 238 254 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 376
Write 252
Mixed 214
SusWrite 329
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 34.7
117% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 305
201% 235 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 99%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 150 153 154 145 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 101
Write 116
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 150
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
187GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 101 100 101 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 105
Write 101
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 101
68% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 69%
Lacie d2 Quadra v3C 500GB
225GB free
Firmware: 1153
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 102 103 102 102 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.5% Above average
Read 98.8
Write 99.8
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 102
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 57%
Toshiba MK6475GSX 640GB-$66
42GB free
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 42 42 40 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 42.3
Write 44.3
Mixed 16
SusWrite 41.2
26% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSBK.8FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
77.6% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 21.7
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 25.7
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 57
70% 57 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H370 Pro4 Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock H370 Pro4 - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback