Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory43.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '20 at 06:58
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 68.3
1-Core 141
2-Core 284
87% 165 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 1,133
100% 850 Pts
64-Core 2,145
133% 2,145 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
MSI(1462 C75C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 123
Parallax 123
103% 124 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 120
Splatting 98.2
104% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
590GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 385 416 419 395 414 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 445
Mixed 422
SusWrite 411
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 41.3
145% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
889GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2379 2222 1558 1572 1558 1576 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
349% Outstanding
Read 2,540
Write 2332
Mixed 1,907
SusWrite 1,811
482% 2,148 MB/s
4K Read 67.9
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 94.1
314% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 969
DQ Write 783
DQ Mixed 926
679% 893 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 349%
Great: 410%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 185 196 195 192 195 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 129 137 136 137 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 129
Write 118
Mixed 100
SusWrite 135
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 85%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121
4.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 202 213 212 210 213 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M4C3000C15 3x16GB
3 of 4 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.6% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback