Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110302
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 29 '20 at 03:34
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 97
1-Core 112
2-Core 227
84% 145 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 446
60% 449 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.7% Poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 33.2
20% 28.6 fps
MRender 36.3
Gravity 36.3
Splatting 34.1
29% 35.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,061
Write 5,559
Mixed 5,696
1,289% 5,772 MB/s
4K Read 362
4K Write 234
4K Mixed 270
1,018% 288 MB/s
DQ Read 1338
DQ Write 1,182
DQ Mixed 1,241
936% 1,254 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 1TB
95GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 29 38 32 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 68.7
Write 70.8
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 36.6
42% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 101%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 500GB
5GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 64 56 62 59 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 66.2
Write 67
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 60.4
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 73%
SanDisk Cruzer Switch 32GB
3GB free, PID 5572
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5.8 5.5 6.8 6.1 6.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 34
Write 7.8
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 6.1
15% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.2
175% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ6GX3M3A1600C8 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 CMZ6GX3M3A1600C8 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63.4% Good
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 20.2
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 20
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 50.4
79% 50.4 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,046 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $849
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback