Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 PRO (all builds)
Memory	7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110302
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '20 at 19:56
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Memory 97.1 1-Core 114 2-Core 229 84% 147 Pts	4-Core 419 8-Core 438 57% 429 Pts	64-Core 447 28% 447 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85C1) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.5% Poor	Lighting 36.3 Reflection 28.3 Parallax 40 30% 34.9 fps	MRender 36.3 Gravity 36.7 Splatting 34.5 29% 35.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6,115 Write 5,548 Mixed 5,695 1,292% 5,786 MB/s	4K Read 370 4K Write 231 4K Mixed 281 1,044% 294 MB/s	DQ Read 1,388 DQ Write 683 DQ Mixed 698 608% 923 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 1TB 1,239 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 96GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 70 65 62 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Read 78.3 Write 78.3 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 66.1 52% 70.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 101%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 500GB 496 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 5GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 65 61 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Read 65.2 Write 67.2 Mixed 47.3 SusWrite 65.9 45% 61.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ6GX3M3A1600C8 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 CMZ6GX3M3A1600C8 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 12GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	64.1% Good	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 20.3 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.9 SC Write 20.5 SC Mixed 19.8 55% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 50 80% 50 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	464x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	289x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	101x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	113x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	72x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	58x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	41x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	42x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	29x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $849

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369