Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	60% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '20 at 09:29
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Memory 71.4 1-Core 143 2-Core 286 89% 167 Pts	4-Core 556 8-Core 835 86% 695 Pts	64-Core 1,044 65% 1,044 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.50 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60% Above average	Lighting 75.2 Reflection 74.5 Parallax 64.7 61% 71.4 fps	MRender 69.1 Gravity 69.1 Splatting 71.6 58% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SATA M.2 500GB-$100 6,800 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 341GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41110WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 220 255 250 245 270 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	97% Outstanding	Read 463 Write 333 Mixed 244 SusWrite 252 72% 323 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 41.1 166% 61.6 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 221 182% 261 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 103%
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$100 16,039 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 317GB free Firmware: X61130WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 431 436 455 457 456 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 446 Mixed 343 SusWrite 437 96% 429 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 88.9 4K Mixed 42.3 158% 56.3 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 199 149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 121%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 67GB free Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 277 236 289 289 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Read 391 Write 254 Mixed 273 SusWrite 236 64% 289 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 90.3 4K Mixed 44.3 161% 57.4 MB/s	DQ Read 251 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 210 159% 215 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 171 173 175 177 176 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Read 138 Write 154 Mixed 157 SusWrite 173 116% 155 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.7 384% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 183 182 184 184 185 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 137 Mixed 86.3 SusWrite 182 108% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 114%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159 43,620 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1GB free Firmware: GM4OA5CA Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 64.5 Write 68.5 Mixed 36.7 42% 56.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 51%
Sony QD-G64E 60GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 54GB free, PID 087c Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 210 213 215 216 215 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB 73,741 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78% Very good	MC Read 32.6 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 34.1 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 32.8 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 98.3 41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $179Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,309x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	873x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $159Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	838x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	572x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	517x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	406x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	343x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	274x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	142x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $1,000

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16