Asus P8P67 DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121031
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '20 at 06:30
Run Duration	235 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	56%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$192 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 70.6 2-Core 134 62% 98.9 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 306 33% 260 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 5,957 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 1B84) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Lighting 69 Reflection 67.7 Parallax 60 56% 65.6 fps	MRender 71.9 Gravity 65.6 Splatting 68.1 56% 68.5 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD Smar tbuy 64GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 17GB free Firmware: SBFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 74 100 92 70 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Read 313 Write 126 Mixed 165 SusWrite 79 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 29.1 4K Mixed 19.6 72% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 24.2 50% 103 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 67%
Kingston SUV400S37480G 480GB 232 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3F SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 64 28 41 71 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 298 Write 132 Mixed 171 SusWrite 56.7 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 28.5 4K Mixed 3.3 47% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 74.8 DQ Mixed 2.4 33% 81.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 79%
512gb SSD 512GB 760 User benchmarks, average bench 133% 366GB free Firmware: 117H SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 235 231 230 231 230 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.4% Good	Read 241 Write 231 Mixed 232 SusWrite 226 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 52.9 4K Mixed 30.2 110% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 38.2 68% 135 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 230%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 595GB free Firmware: CC4D SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 130 129 129 130 130 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Read 157 Write 116 Mixed 81.3 SusWrite 128 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 112%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41 7,860 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2TB free Firmware: AA10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 84 82 84 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 132 Write 132 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 83.5 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 83%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 4.5TB free, PID ac39 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 102 113 116 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 106 Write 124 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 106 139% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 55%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 58GB free, PID ac25 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 84 68 64 78 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 57.3 Write 82.3 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 76.9 81% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.4 158% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 2000 C9 4x4GB 488 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 18.3 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 14.3 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 DELUXE - $100

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	584x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	159x
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	106x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	76x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	60x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	60x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	41x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	36x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	50x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	39x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $709

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16