Lenovo 81NC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81NC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190709
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 28 '20 at 05:40
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 212
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 531
58% 457 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3802) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.12.3
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Lighting 12.4
Reflection 13
Parallax 15.9
10% 13.8 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 15.7
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM128GDHTNG-8310A 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80060C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 105 103 100 94 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 931
Write 105
Mixed 198
SusWrite 102
72% 334 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 35.7
160% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 162
128% 181 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 100%
Great: 132%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
717GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 109 114 115 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 85
Write 132
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 113
73% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Kingston 9905711-016.A00G 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
64.7% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 21.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 21.8
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81NC Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81NC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback