ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 81NC

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Lenovo 81NC (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190709
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 02 '19 at 18:33
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 78,189 User benchmarks, average bench 48% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 70.4 1-Core 113 2-Core 208 73% 131 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 541 54% 438 Pts	64-Core 544 34% 544 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Legend(17AA 3802) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.9.2 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Lighting 12.8 Reflection 13 Parallax 15.6 10% 13.8 fps	MRender 12.3 Gravity 14 Splatting 17.4 12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM128GDHTNG-8310A 128GB 4,082 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80060C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 130 120 114 112 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 941 Write 178 Mixed 245 SusWrite 123 80% 372 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 38.1 163% 62 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 185 145% 202 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 132%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 799GB free Firmware: LCM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 120 126 131 131 130 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 118 Write 133 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 127 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.3 142% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Kingston 9905711-016.A00G 8GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	67.1% Good	MC Read 24.3 MC Write 23.3 MC Mixed 21.7 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 22.9 72% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 81NC Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81NC

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	163x
Ryzen 7 3700UAMDBench 49%, 23,686 samples	80x
Ryzen 3 3200UAMDBench 41%, 21,522 samples	36x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	163x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	80x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	36x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPMUW-512G-1101 512GBWDCBench 156%, 10,396 samples	64x
RPFTJ256PDD2MWX 256GBBench 86%, 6,231 samples	39x
RPFTJ128PDD2EWX 128GBBench 68%, 9,061 samples	37x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBMicronBench 59%, 5,397 samples	34x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	33x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Ramaxel RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 8GBMicronBench 54%, 1,618 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback