| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | Intel H55 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20151203 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 28 '20 at 01:43 |
| Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
| Run User | LBY-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.8%
Very good
|
64% 105 Pts
|
40% 317 Pts
|
23% 372 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro 6000
Nvidia(10DE 076F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 573 MHz, MLim: 747 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 377.83
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
15% 22.2 fps
|
19% 23.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 22 15 34 39 62 MB/s
|
34%
Below average
|
45% 61.3 MB/s
|
127% 1.03 MB/s
| |
|
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD032 320GB
248GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 11 27 17 18 27 MB/s
|
10.1%
Very poor
|
29% 22.9 MB/s
|
26% 0.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.8%
Poor
|
21% 7.3 GB/s
|
27% 9.33 GB/s
|
65% 61.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H55 Builds (Compare 2,103 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel H55
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 643x |
| Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 244x |
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 224x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 441x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 304x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 176x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $70 |