PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte A320M-S2H |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181225 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Mar 27 '20 at 21:17 |
Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 34% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
MSI(1462 3171) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.3%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata SU635 480GB-$40
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N181017a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 60 72 29 70 62 MB/s
|
62.4%
Good
|
|||
WD WD5000AUDX-63WNHY0 500GB
101GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 88 89 89 89 MB/s
|
50.4%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
77.7%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 817x |
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 783x |
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 747x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 773x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 447x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 414x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 90% - Excellent | Total price: $418 |