Asus X99-E-10G WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive	417% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E-10G WS (all builds)
Memory	61.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190527
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '20 at 19:43
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6900K-$120 6,755 User benchmarks, average bench 86% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 96.1 1-Core 139 2-Core 281 95% 172 Pts	4-Core 563 8-Core 1,094 98% 828 Pts	64-Core 1,491 92% 1,491 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E4) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.74 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 109% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 185GB free Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1667 1669 1617 1657 1648 1641 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	351% Outstanding	Read 2,646 Write 1,630 Mixed 1,132 SusWrite 1,650 393% 1,764 MB/s	4K Read 56.6 4K Write 209 4K Mixed 82 302% 116 MB/s	DQ Read 1247 DQ Write 1,095 DQ Mixed 1097 843% 1,146 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 351% Great: 353%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 737GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2521 2529 2531 2531 2533 2536 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	417% Outstanding	Read 2,793 Write 2507 Mixed 1410 SusWrite 2,530 518% 2,310 MB/s	4K Read 59.9 4K Write 221 4K Mixed 89.8 323% 124 MB/s	DQ Read 1,247 DQ Write 1,066 DQ Mixed 1,165 871% 1,159 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 417% Great: 425%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK32GX4M4B3200C16 CMK32GX4M4D3200C16 CMK32GX4M4B3200C16 CMK32GX4M4D3200C16 CMK32GX4M4B3200C16 CMK32GX4M4D3200C16 CMK32GX4M4B3200C16 CMK32GX4M4D3200C16 64GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 129% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	128% Outstanding	MC Read 60.7 MC Write 45.9 MC Mixed 42.8 142% 49.8 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 24.2 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 53.7 74% 53.7 ns
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 133%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E-10G WS Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 114%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus X99-E-10G WS

CPU
Core i7-6950XIntel $499Bench 87%, 6,135 samples	16x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	14x
Xeon E5-2690 v4IntelBench 76%, 795 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	25x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	8x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	6x

SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $170Bench 322%, 93,447 samples	6x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	5x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	5x

RAM
Dominator DDR4 2400 C14 8x8GBCorsairBench 124%, 153 samples	8x
M391A1K43BB1-CRC 4x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 34 samples	4x
16ATF2G64AZ-2G1B1 2x16GBMicronBench 73%, 274 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,154

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16