Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel U2300 281 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	Memory 43.9 1-Core 6.4 2-Core 11.6 17% 20.6 Pts	4-Core 15.5 8-Core 18.1 2% 16.8 Pts	64-Core 5.9 0% 5.9 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 0300) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.25% Terrible	Lighting 0.33 Reflection 0.27 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.25 fps	MRender 0.24 Gravity 0.33 Splatting 0.22 0% 0.26 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.25% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139 17,545 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: X230 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 168 182 183 191 194 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.4% Below average	Read 196 Write 182 Mixed 140 SusWrite 180 39% 175 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 16.6 4K Mixed 13.6 44% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 98.6 DQ Write 74.2 DQ Mixed 66.7 55% 79.8 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 99%
Ut163 USB2FlashStorage 1GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 1GB free, PID 0602 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3 3.2 3.1 2.8 3.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	1.58% Terrible	Read 5.6 Write 2.2 Mixed 2.9 SusWrite 3 4% 3.43 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.58% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 80CE M471B2873EH1-CF8 3GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 800, 800 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	7.64% Terrible	MC Read 2.9 MC Write 1.7 MC Mixed 2.7 7% 2.43 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 0.8 3% 1.13 GB/s	Latency 185 22% 185 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.64% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16