Apple iMacPro1,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple iMacPro1,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-7BA5B2D9E42DDD94
Memory59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '20 at 11:13
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2191B
CPU0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 203
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 810
71% 606 Pts
64-Core 2,482
154% 2,482 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Apple(106B 017C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 786 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 18.50.24.01
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.6% Excellent
Lighting 99.3
Reflection 74
Parallax 141
81% 105 fps
MRender 74.3
Gravity 107
Splatting 107
80% 96 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 90%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP2048 2TB
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 177.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1954 1938 1833 2225 2166 2116 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-2G6D2 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
141% Outstanding
MC Read 69.4
MC Write 56.5
MC Mixed 46.2
164% 57.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 141%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMacPro1,1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: Apple iMacPro1,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 142% - Outstanding Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback