HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1495
Memory7 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110609
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateMar 27 '20 at 07:30
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 178
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 321
46% 336 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Zotac(19DA 1291) 1GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.05
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 16.4
15% 16.9 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 16
15% 19.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721025CLA682 250GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP1OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 51 55 77 84 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 123
Write 118
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 65.8
67% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 75%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
90GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 69 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 57.5
Write 58
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 68.7
41% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 61%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 33 33 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 136
Write 83.7
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 33.1
62% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.8
277% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
35GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 32 33 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 82.3
Write 74.5
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 32.3
49% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.5
204% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
454GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 34 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 73
Write 86.8
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 33.4
48% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
195% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31%
Great: 92%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
561GB free
Firmware: 0739
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 33 33 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 98.5
Write 71.3
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 33.1
48% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 97%
SanDisk Cruzer 16GB
11GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.1 5.5 5.2 5.5 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
4.8% Terrible
Read 16
Write 2.3
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 5.2
7% 6.57 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.8%
Great: 17%
HITACHI HTS725050A9A364 500GB
187GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 25.3
Mixed 23
SusWrite 24.2
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 18%
WD My Book 25DA 6TB
376GB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 33 33 33 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 24.7
Write 105
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 32.5
68% 45.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.8
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 67%
WD My Book 25DA 6TB
375GB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 32 33 33 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
20% Poor
Read 31.2
Write 92.2
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 32.3
65% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
128% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-002.A00LF Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1600C11 14GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.2% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11.2
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback