Lenovo 30B4S0NU00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30B4S0NU00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 102F
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170302
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 26 '20 at 20:34
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 87.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 219
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 790
79% 641 Pts
64-Core 968
60% 968 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 377.11
Relative performance (0th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 21.8
Parallax 26.6
14% 21.8 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 30.4
Splatting 33.2
25% 30.1 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 456GB
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 55 62 62 67 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 786
Write 24.5
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 62.6
169% 234 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 4.2
930% 5.53 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 244%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 34.3
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 18.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30B4S0NU00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

System: Lenovo 30B4S0NU00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $510
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback