Gigabyte GA-H81M-H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-H  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '20 at 19:47
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 81.1
2-Core 161
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 336
36% 285 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Zotac(19DA 3265) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 39.3
26% 33.2 fps
MRender 43.3
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 34.8
32% 39 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 366 415 324 264 398 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 278
Write 284
Mixed 293
SusWrite 349
68% 301 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 29.1
96% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 158
150% 230 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
475GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 114 114 115 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 120
Write 120
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 114
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
55.8% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 18.3
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 14.4
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-H Builds (Compare 1,372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-H - $112

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback