Positivo POS-PIQ77CL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Positivo POS-PIQ77CL (all builds)
Motherboard	Positivo POS-PIQ77CL
Memory	6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130308
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '20 at 16:28
Run Duration	109 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2310-$90 15,623 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 75.1 2-Core 153 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 283 36% 272 Pts	64-Core 283 18% 283 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 378E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Lighting 38.6 Reflection 29.6 Parallax 36.4 32% 34.9 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 35.3 Splatting 34.9 29% 35.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 28 34 61 64 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 152 Write 139 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 51.4 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 029E CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 12GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.6% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 10.4 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 11.5 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical POS-PIQ77CL Builds (Compare 238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-PIQ77CL

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	95x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	43x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	33x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	101x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	14x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	13x

SSD
240GB 240GBSSDBench 64%, 5,968 samples	27x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	12x

RAM
76.A146G.C330C 2x2GBUnknownBench 40%, 57 samples	35x
SH564128FH8N6TNFQG 2x4GBSmartBench 51%, 227 samples	10x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16