Positivo POS-PIQ77CL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemPositivo POS-PIQ77CL  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-PIQ77CL
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130308
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 17 '20 at 02:59
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2310-$90
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 66
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 108
52% 83.5 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 167
21% 161 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 378E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 36.9
31% 35 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 37.3
Splatting 35.4
30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 31 34 30 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 52.5
Write 34
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 28.3
28% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 029E CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
34.3% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 7.9
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-PIQ77CL Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-PIQ77CL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback