Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '20 at 23:00
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 49.7
2-Core 97.1
46% 72.2 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 180
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6990 (Crossfire Disabled)
Asus(1043 03E4) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 26.5
Reflection 23.1
Parallax 25.9
22% 25.2 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 24.4
Splatting 28.3
20% 24.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 103 104 103 98 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.3% Below average
Read 275
Write 154
Mixed 181
SusWrite 101
39% 177 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 15.5
61% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 31.1
DQ Write 83.9
DQ Mixed 41.1
36% 52 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 116%
OCZ VERTEX-LE 50GB
28GB free
Firmware: 1.37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 63 61 61 62 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 122
Write 76
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 62.6
20% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 13.8
47% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 28.4
DQ Write 73.4
DQ Mixed 29.2
28% 43.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 47%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 31 60 36 52 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 16.8
Write 30.3
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 42.7
21% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 109 108 109 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 178
Write 154
Mixed 65
SusWrite 108
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.8% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 12.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.5
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback