| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 93.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 4096x2160x4294967296 szín |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160106 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 25 '20 at 00:56 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 32% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.1%
Good
|
55% 94.9 Pts
|
43% 351 Pts
|
28% 447 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1410 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
21%
Poor
|
8% 28 fps
|
46% 56.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 314 314 313 292 181 MB/s
|
93.7%
Outstanding
|
90% 399 MB/s
|
144% 48 MB/s
|
196% 263 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
273GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 104 105 105 104 MB/s
|
56.7%
Above average
|
66% 89.2 MB/s
|
156% 1.07 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
161GB free
Firmware: SC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 158 161 160 161 161 MB/s
|
71%
Very good
|
72% 98.2 MB/s
|
239% 2.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.8%
Below average
|
32% 11.4 GB/s
|
23% 7.9 GB/s
|
46% 87.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 258 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 139x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 29x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 19x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 22x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 18x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $489 |