HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory19.4 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '20 at 13:54
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3550
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 160
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 272
32% 247 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 375.86
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.54% Terrible
Lighting 7.67
Reflection 8.81
Parallax 6.38
6% 7.62 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 7.87
Splatting 8.48
7% 8.75 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.54%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 251
Write 238
Mixed 222
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 36.7
121% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 196
147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 500GB
42GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 98
Write 80.2
Mixed 52.3
57% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.3
219% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
299GB free
Firmware: KC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 110 111 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 116
Write 114
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 110
72% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
390GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 122 130 131 131 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74% Very good
Read 132
Write 134
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 125
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 74%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
212GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 115 126 129 130 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 130
Write 132
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 122
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 70%
Generic Ultra HS-SD/MMC 4GB
2GB free, PID 4060
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
9.67% Terrible
Read 19.3
Write 11.5
Mixed 11
SusWrite 11.8
17% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.7
108% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.67%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF ID:01 98 9965432-082.A00LF 58GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 15.7
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 10.2
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback