Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 96% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200207
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '20 at 03:29
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$349 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Memory 78.4 1-Core 127 2-Core 254 84% 153 Pts	4-Core 508 8-Core 1,017 90% 762 Pts	64-Core 1,543 96% 1,543 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.74 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Lighting 140 Reflection 152 Parallax 141 114% 144 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 137 Splatting 111 99% 122 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB 35,237 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 378GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 322 318 311 311 310 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 496 Mixed 466 SusWrite 316 101% 449 MB/s	4K Read 44.4 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 62.8 215% 77.8 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 250 218% 324 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 126%
Toshiba MD04ACA600 6TB-$250 686 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 153 157 157 155 156 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 160 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 156 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 342% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3200C16-16GTZ CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3200C16-16GTZ 64GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 50.9 MC Mixed 30.1 106% 37 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 10.9 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 83.6 48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $206Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	498x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	262x
Core i7-7740XIntel $230Bench 87%, 5,094 samples	150x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	170x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	152x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	96x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $75Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	79x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	62x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	56x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $780

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16