Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '20 at 15:33
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 77.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 251
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 1003
90% 757 Pts
64-Core 1575
98% 1575 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 146
Parallax 135
106% 137 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 132
Splatting 106
95% 117 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 488 490 416 300 301 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 496
Mixed 467
SusWrite 413
106% 473 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 62.4
213% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 128%
Great: 126%
Toshiba MD04ACA600 6TB-$250
2.5TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 163 165 168 165 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 152
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 166
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
405% 3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 112%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
5GB free, PID 8003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3.7 3.9 4 3.8 3.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Read 11
Write 4.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 3.6
8% 6.28 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3200C16-16GTZ CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3200C16-16GTZ 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
93% Outstanding
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 50.9
MC Mixed 30.3
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 10.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 93%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,659 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $796
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback