Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX H270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '20 at 22:40
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 224
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 436
58% 432 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 8752) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70% Good
Lighting 84.7
Reflection 72.4
Parallax 63
69% 73.4 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 77.5
Splatting 75.7
72% 90.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SB8W256G 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 201 207 204 205 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 310
Mixed 212
SusWrite 205
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 46.1
165% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 279
218% 304 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 102%
Sandisk SD9SB8W256G 256GB
19GB free
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 220 224 190 153 160 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 306
Mixed 173
SusWrite 193
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 46.9
165% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 221
189% 281 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 102%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
943GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 104 103 104 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 79.5
Write 71
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 103
56% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 165 165 166 166 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 162
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 163
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G4D30AET4K.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.2% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 23.8
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 23.4
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $761
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback