Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX H270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '20 at 21:45
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$88
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 229
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 443
59% 444 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 8752) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Lighting 93.5
Reflection 81.8
Parallax 78.9
76% 84.8 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 75.7
Splatting 71.5
70% 88.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SB8W256G 256GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 208 210 211 204 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 467
Mixed 344
SusWrite 218
85% 382 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 54.3
189% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 280
230% 329 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 108%
Great: 102%
Sandisk SD9SB8W256G 256GB
20GB free
Firmware: X6107000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 511
Write 491
Mixed 336
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 55.4
199% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 274
227% 327 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 102%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 103 108 113 112 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 117
Write 112
Mixed 58
SusWrite 110
72% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 158 159 160 159 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 158
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 157
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G4D30AET4K.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.7% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 24
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 25.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $749
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback