Asus KGP(M)E-D16

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus KGP(M)E-D16  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK KGP(M)E-D16
Memory22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160616
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 22 '20 at 22:34
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User HND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6128
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 29.1
2-Core 58.7
38% 54.2 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 234
21% 176 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
Sapphire(174B E305) 2GB
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.12.3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Lighting 45
Reflection 50.5
Parallax 58.8
37% 51.4 fps
MRender 50.4
Gravity 42
Splatting 36.2
34% 42.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel S3500 Series 300GB-$111
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D2010370
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 92 93 91 91 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.8% Below average
Read 202
Write 182
Mixed 152
SusWrite 90.7
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 19.7
65% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 56
DQ Mixed 28.3
25% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 91%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.5 2.8 2.4 16 16 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10.6% Very poor
Read 173
Write 109
Mixed 45
SusWrite 7
18% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 1
8% 4.13 MB/s
DQ Read 3.7
DQ Write 46.8
DQ Mixed 3.1
9% 17.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 126%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: CC94
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 90 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 83
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 90.1
58% 78.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 53%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
315GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 92 94 91 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 94.5
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 91.6
63% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-454.A00LF 99U5402-454.A00LF Micron 18JSF51272AZ-1G6M1 Micron 18JSF51272AZ-1G6M1 99U5402-454.A00LF 99U5402-454.A00LF Micron 18JSF51272AZ-1G6M1 Micron 18JSF51272AZ-1G6M1 32GB
667, 667, 800, 800, 667, 667, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.8% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 9.8
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.7
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KGP(M)E-D16 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus KGP(M)E-D16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $503
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback