Empty empty

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Empty empty (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160907
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '20 at 17:44
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	33%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2715QE 32 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	62% Good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 69.7 2-Core 126 60% 94.8 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 268 30% 233 Pts	64-Core 299 18% 299 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.3 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	54.7% Above average	Lighting 68.3 Reflection 67.4 Parallax 82.2 56% 72.7 fps	MRender 69.8 Gravity 69.3 Splatting 57.1 53% 65.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149 13,029 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC10365 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 139 132 128 111 103 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 200 Write 142 Mixed 140 SusWrite 126 34% 152 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 29 4K Mixed 19.4 65% 21.6 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 67.6 DQ Mixed 45.2 49% 82.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 51%
Seagate ST33000651NS 3TB 6,381 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 1.5TB free Firmware: G009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 89 89 98 98 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 68.5 Write 105 Mixed 42.8 SusWrite 91.9 56% 77.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 86%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 29GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5 6.5 5 5.4 4.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	8.49% Terrible	Read 19.3 Write 8.7 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 5.2 12% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.9 119% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.49% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Goodram GR1600D364L11/8G 2x8GB 992 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	52.2% Above average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 19.3 MC Mixed 16.8 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 14 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical empty Builds (Compare 555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Empty empty

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	38x
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples	26x
Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples	22x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	51x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
120G 120GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 66%, 4,962 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	41x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	29x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16