Empty empty

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemEmpty empty  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160907
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 21 '20 at 18:09
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2715QE
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 132
58% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 287
31% 247 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E387) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.3
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Lighting 67.6
Reflection 68.1
Parallax 82.4
55% 72.7 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 69.4
Splatting 57.3
52% 65.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10365
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 119 120 111 106 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 232
Write 162
Mixed 155
SusWrite 118
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 17.5
58% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 68.4
DQ Mixed 65.6
58% 89.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 51%
Seagate ST33000651NS 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: G009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 120 125 127 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 146
Write 145
Mixed 69
SusWrite 124
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 86%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
29GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 3.2 4.4 5.2 6.8 5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
8.76% Terrible
Read 18
Write 2.5
Mixed 3.3
SusWrite 5
7% 7.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.1
131% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.76%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR1600D364L11/8G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 14.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical empty Builds (Compare 555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Empty empty

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback