Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	65.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER (all builds)
Memory	29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151028
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '17 at 18:51
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	44.7% Average	Memory 68 1-Core 24.6 2-Core 59.4 35% 50.7 Pts	4-Core 116 8-Core 389 27% 252 Pts	64-Core 652 40% 652 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1566 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Lighting 87.7 Reflection 68.1 Parallax 67.8 72% 74.6 fps	MRender 76.1 Gravity 67.6 Splatting 59.7 55% 67.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$123 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5317 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2020 (B1) Unknown 97 97 130 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 58 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 308 (F1) Unknown 99 99 46641105940	85.8% Excellent	Read 508 Write 484 Mixed 508 112% 500 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 52.3 4K Mixed 26.4 103% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 88.2 DQ Mixed 61.9 56% 86.3 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$123 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 198GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6848 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2571 (B1) Unknown 98 98 83 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 61 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 427 (F1) Unknown 99 99 37953386496	82.1% Excellent	Read 505 Write 484 Mixed 508 112% 499 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 52.7 4K Mixed 19.1 94% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 77.6 DQ Mixed 61.4 56% 85.5 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 98GB free Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 3170007 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -21242908245757 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 82 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 17 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 30 40 77312032798 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 77312032798 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3170007 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3170007 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3170007 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 38654705664 (E9) Unknown 0 0 535 (EA) Unknown 0 0 593 (F1) Unknown 0 0 593 (F2) Unknown 0 0 534 (F4) Unknown 100 100 917508	54.3% Above average	Read 422 Write 128 Mixed 180 53% 243 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 51.8 4K Mixed 16.2 87% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 86.3 DQ Write 97.6 DQ Mixed 35.5 42% 73.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 839GB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 231738304 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 879 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 60 6207801 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2665 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 880 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 67 487915549 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 44 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 72 72 57627 (C2) HDA temperature 29 40 60129542173 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 55271934133160 (F1) Unknown 100 253 17711943214 (F2) Unknown 100 253 43863430410	108% Outstanding	Read 201 Write 175 Mixed 164 135% 180 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.19 89% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 809GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 77 63 54111095 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 385 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 44323932 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1087 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 386 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 11 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 55 504692765 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 385 (C2) HDA temperature 29 13 55834574877 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 7 1 54111095 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -115629109541826 (F1) Unknown 100 253 6266420563 (F2) Unknown 100 253 8320894449	107% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 189 Mixed 147 130% 174 MB/s	4K Read 1.01 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.26 103% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB 1,459 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	MC Read 31.6 MC Write 32.6 MC Mixed 27.7 88% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 20.8 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 8.5 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,801 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	1,629x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	450x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	224x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	407x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	231x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	158x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	107x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	103x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	109x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	107x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	91x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $925

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16