Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive273% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '20 at 14:56
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 152
2-Core 304
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 1,064
100% 828 Pts
64-Core 1,460
90% 1,460 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 142
Parallax 121
106% 131 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 125
Splatting 104
92% 113 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 898 593 608 610 606 610 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 2,560
Write 2,227
Mixed 1,486
SusWrite 654
386% 1,732 MB/s
4K Read 59.5
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 80.6
265% 91.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1107
DQ Write 1048
DQ Mixed 1,061
801% 1,072 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 273%
Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
191GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 487 386 299 297 298 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 488
Mixed 460
SusWrite 376
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 57
189% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 369
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 119%
Great: 128%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
590GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1052 1051 1054 1058 1057 1055 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,306
Write 1,083
Mixed 920
SusWrite 1,054
245% 1,091 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 68.3
230% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 683
DQ Write 667
DQ Mixed 273
316% 541 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 218%
Great: 295%
Intel SSDSC2BB480G6 480GB
439GB free
Firmware: G2010150
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 432 434 433 432 433 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 344
Write 434
Mixed 308
SusWrite 433
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 35.3
135% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 241
183% 247 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
840GB free
Firmware: CC4G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 194 192 195 195 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 170
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 193
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
728GB free
Firmware: JA0OA7G0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 84 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 67.1
Write 64.2
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 84.1
44% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
225GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 124 127 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 127
Write 121
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 125
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 74%
USB 3.0 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 148 148 147 150 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 156
Write 140
Mixed 116
SusWrite 148
104% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 38.1
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 39
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,090
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback