TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics60.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory17.9 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '20 at 14:38
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3565
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 58.9
2-Core 110
51% 81.2 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 400
37% 310 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 57.5%
 Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E376)
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.1
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.2% Good
Lighting 54.8
Reflection 72.7
Parallax 153
45% 93.4 fps
MRender 87.5
Gravity 107
Splatting 128
90% 108 fps
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 60.2%
 Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS250G32TND-3110A 250GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30060P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 139 120 142 115 159 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.8% Good
Read 246
Write 235
Mixed 228
SusWrite 150
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 33.3
109% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 192
145% 194 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 61.8%
 Great: 105%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
4GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 119
Write 108
Mixed 64.5
72% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:83 0B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG ID:83 0B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG ID:83 0B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG ID:83 0B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG ID:83 0B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG ID:83 0B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.8% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 15.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 38.8%
 Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel  $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples570x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples539x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples493x
GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples277x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples157x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples138x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples138x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples74x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples66x
RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples17x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback