Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 82 1-Core 72.7 2-Core 144 60% 99.4 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 428 44% 352 Pts	64-Core 426 26% 426 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.50 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Lighting 22 Reflection 17.1 Parallax 20.1 18% 19.7 fps	MRender 25.3 Gravity 22.1 Splatting 16.9 17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 473 Write 320 Mixed 245 76% 346 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 63.9 4K Mixed 33.3 121% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 120 112% 177 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268 8,165 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 526GB free Firmware: 04.06A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 121 120 122 122 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Read 189 Write 176 Mixed 118 SusWrite 120 111% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.7 353% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 117%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. F3-12800CL9-4GBXL BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 24GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	45.9% Average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 15.1 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 11.6 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610