Asrock 870 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics63% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 870 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '17 at 21:16
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 82.9
1-Core 52.4
2-Core 106
52% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 283
30% 236 Pts
64-Core 282
18% 282 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63% Good
Lighting 78.8
Reflection 79.7
Parallax 74.6
64% 77.7 fps
MRender 72.2
Gravity 74.3
Splatting 75
61% 73.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GOODRAM 240GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM22.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 368
Write 344
Mixed 359
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 11.7
76% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 25.8
DQ Write 78.9
DQ Mixed 11.2
20% 38.6 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 102%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9300
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 29.1
Mixed 26.9
22% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.05
4K Write 3.06
4K Mixed 0.4
144% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 67%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$81
208GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 150
Write 136
Mixed 110
98% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 2.26
4K Mixed 0.19
98% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GR1333D364L9S/4G00 GR1333D364L9S/4G00 GR1333D364L9/4G000 GR1333D364L9/4G000 16GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.3% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 12
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9.3
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 870 Extreme3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback