HP Pro 3130 Microtower PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pro 3130 Microtower PC  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '20 at 22:14
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G6950-$38
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Memory 48.9
1-Core 32.6
2-Core 62
31% 47.8 Pts
4-Core 60.7
8-Core 63.8
8% 62.2 Pts
64-Core 61.3
4% 61.3 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
HP(103C 2A9C) 732MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.61% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.85
Parallax 0.69
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.05
Gravity 0.53
Splatting 1.09
1% 0.89 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.61%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 58 57 58 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 171
Write 64.1
Mixed 80.1
SusWrite 58
21% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 14.1
50% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 80.3
DQ Write 62.1
DQ Mixed 71.2
53% 71.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE80CE80 M378B5773DH0-CH9 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.43 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3130 Microtower PC Builds (Compare 334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3130 Microtower PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $138
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback