ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 4290J14

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Lenovo 4290J14 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 4290J14
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366x768x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161012
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '20 at 19:18
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34 45,308 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	58% Above average	Memory 82 1-Core 78.4 2-Core 147 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 200 27% 200 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21DA) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.21% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 3.65 Parallax 1.62 2% 2.57 fps	MRender 3.38 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.52 3% 3.08 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.21% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
JSYERA-S100360SSD 360GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 303GB free (System drive) Firmware: T180910 SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 440 445 365 353 352 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 363 Write 348 Mixed 335 SusWrite 390 81% 359 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 43.9 4K Mixed 16.8 61% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 235 177% 233 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AtermiterH0-CK0 2x4GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	49.3% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 14.5 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback