Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190228
Uptime13.6 Days
Run DateMar 17 '20 at 15:09
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 77.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 252
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 742
74% 604 Pts
64-Core 992
61% 992 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
44.8% Average
Lighting 58
Reflection 54.1
Parallax 47.8
47% 53.3 fps
MRender 45.4
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 49.9
40% 48.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 3.8 69 18 51 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 438
Write 356
Mixed 249
SusWrite 58.6
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 16.3
57% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 79.7
DQ Mixed 33.2
42% 76.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 60%
SanDisk Cruzer 64GB
48GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.7 9.5 12 10 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 32
Write 8.5
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 10.3
18% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 3.2
232% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 14.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 17
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,072 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback